2022 MT-10 - touring screen to suit tall rider?

What did you end up getting?

I'm 6'5", long in the torso, and would love to hear if you found something that worked for you.

Finding gear that fits is a major challenge - I love my jacket (it's just barely long enough), but it's begun flapping between the neck and shoulders at speed (making for a TON of noise). I'm hoping a windscreen could deflect enough to minimize that without causing a stronger headblast.

The Puig Touring Plus isn't available for gen2 mt10s, but a similar model is - www.cyclegear.com/parts/puig-touring-naked-new-generation-windscreen-yamaha-mt-10-sp-2022-2023

Does anyone tall have experience with this combination?

OEM:


Puig Touring Naked

I'm 6' 3" I picked up a 2022 MT-10 last week, immediately put on the OEM screen and took a 300 mile trip.  While I appreciated that it moved the wind blast off my chest (it was 50 degrees out), it directs the wind right to my helmet.  It doesn't produce much buffeting, but it does increase wind noise materially.  Despite trying to shift positions, I'm not able to fully tuck in behind it for any period of time.  I too am interested in whether the Puig might offer better wind flow/protection for tall riders.  The dimensions of the two screens are quite similar, but it appears the Puig angles a bit more up vs. the OEM curving toward the rider.  If so, it's possible, it pushes the air slightly higher and might offer little bigger pocket.  Sounds like kinnanigans has had success.  Any other riders try the Puig touring?  

I have a 2023 MT-10 and immediately purchased the OEM Touring windshield which I LOVE the way it looks but honestly it is pretty worthless compared to other windscreens I have used on other models that actually WORKED  And I am only 5' 10".  The only way I can make this work is by doing a ridiculous tuck behind it....Which if there were any way to install clip on bars (there ain't lol) THEN it would no doubt work.  Now my Tracer 9gt came standard equipped with a much taller windscreen...not nearly as nice looking but it actually works for the most part.  Previously I owned an older 650 VeeStrom with a madstadt windshield ....THAT was the ultimate!  It was pure bliss dead air behind that one!  Of course the bike was gutless and did not provide a fraction of the fun and excitement of my MT-10....or even the Tracer for that matter.   Somehow the market has gotten really screwed up  and manufacturers ignore REALLY important elements ...why?  Because the influencers SAY you will enjoy owning a naked bike ....and you might ON SHORT RIDES  And is it just me or are there hardly any MT-10s on the market or being discussed with anything like high mileage?  What does it say when owners are not piling the miles on a model like other owners ARE doing with other models?  What I think it screams is that one model is miserable to ride all day while another is awesome to.  Comfortable sport touring bikes you hear owners talking really high miles and the used examples on the market also clearly reflect the same thing.  I think R1s even get ridden more than their more ergonomically comfortable counterpart and MAYBE it is down to wind protection....which the MT-10 has precious LITTLE of   Funny thing is its ancestor the FZ1 did have some wind protection!  But somehow the influencers told us naked bikes are more desirable....uhhh I don't think so ....at all!  WTF???  Chime anyone here with some serious miles on the naked liter bike?  That goes all day on the highways at speed?  Chime in if you have 30k +miles on your MT-10

Naked bikes are more desirable for me. I've owed 5 Gen1 FZ1s and 1 Gen 2 and have always put the shortest screen on them and made a couple of them naked. Had a 2012 Speed Triple R, I prefer a naked bike. Get a helmet that deals with wind better, or a Miata. 300 mile days are the norm and I've never had an issue with a naked bike. For reference I'm 6'4" with a long torso, so nothing short of a barn door will block wind. You don't ride a naked bike for "dead air", that's what touring bikes are for.